This page contains affiliate links. We earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
Nectar and Lull are both all-foam, medium-feel mattresses sold online at competitive prices. They look similar on a spec sheet, but they don't feel identical, and one offers dramatically better buyer protections. Here's how they compare after real testing.
I tested both in Queen over seven nights each. For the complete Nectar lineup, see the Nectar review; for the broader category, the best memory foam mattresses guide.
Specs Comparison
| Feature | Nectar | Lull |
|---|---|---|
| Layers | Gel memory foam + support core | 3-layer foam (gel + memory + base) |
| Firmness | Medium-firm (6/10) | Medium (6/10) |
| Feel | Slow contouring hug | Slightly more responsive |
| Trial Period | 365 nights | 100 nights |
| Warranty | Forever warranty | 10 years |
The Differences That Matter
On feel, the two are close. Nectar's gel memory foam contours a touch more deeply, cradling the hips and shoulders for side sleepers. Lull's top layer rebounds slightly faster, giving it a marginally more responsive surface that some combination sleepers prefer. Neither difference is dramatic.
Both isolate motion well — couples won't be disturbed by a partner's movement on either bed. Cooling is comparable, with both running slightly warm relative to hybrids but acceptable for all-foam construction.
Where Nectar pulls decisively ahead is ownership terms: a full 365-night trial versus Lull's 100 nights, and a forever warranty versus Lull's 10 years. For two beds that feel this similar, those protections make Nectar the lower-risk purchase.
Performance Scores
For more head-to-heads, see the full comparisons index. Or browse our top-rated mattresses of 2026.